In view of his talent and taking into account his recognition, the publishers of ” Ananda Vikatan” approached him to license his drawings for. Get your digital copy of Aval Vikatan Magazine – January 15, issue on Magzter and enjoy reading it on iPad, iPhone, Android devices and the web.
|Published (Last):||9 April 2011|
|PDF File Size:||6.22 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||8.27 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Ananda Vikatan Cinema Awards
Yet, the settled principle of law is that even where prima facie case is in favour of the plaintiff, the Court will refuse temporary injunction if the injury vilatan by the plaintiff on account of refusal of temporary injunction was not irreparable.
Therefore, the ownership of copyright vested only with Silpi and the appellant inherited the said right. The write up produced by the respondents contains a reference that Silpi left Ananda Vikatan which he had served for years and joined Bhavans Journal in Bombay.
Since Silpi died intestate, his right over his works devolved on the appellant and his sister and they have been exploiting the copyright by licensing them to publishers, Corporate entities and Government Departments in various ways including by using them in calendars, greeting cards, booklets etc.
For the song “Ariyaatha Vayasu” from Paruthiveeran. Free for one month and jab only if you like it. In addition, temporary injunction being an equitable relief, the discretion to grant such relief will be exercised only when the plaintiff’s conduct is free from blame and he approaches the court with clean hands. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
His drawings were given to the magazine for publication on license basis. Mali was equally attracted by the marvelous works of Silpi, even as a student at the Government School of Arts and 213, Egmore. The right claimed by the appellant under Section 57 of the Copyright appears to have no basis. Section 17 of the Copyright Act reads thus: For the song “Unnai Kanadhu” from Vishwaroopam.
Aval Vikatan – அவள் விகடன் – Issue date – 01 January
There is no dispute with regard to the factual position that the art works published in Ananda Vikatan under the title “Thennattu Selvangal” during the period to were all created by Silpi.
Therefore, the publication would come under Section 17 a of the Copyright Act. This page was last edited on 14 Octoberat For the song “Kaththazha Kannale” from Anjathe.
Views Read Edit View history. The contribution made by Sri P. Silpi had drawn more than drawings over a career spread over more than 50 years. It is said that Silpi was very much attracted by the works of Thiru. We are now concerned only with the prima facie case and as to whether balance of convenience is in favour of granting injunction and thereafter, the question of irreparable injury. The ceremony’s main broadcaster is Sun TV.
For the song “Nee Kobappattal Naanum” from Villu. We are in complete agreement with the views expressed by the learned Single Judge.
There is no dispute that all these works were earlier published in Ananda Vikatan during the period from to CS1 Tamil-language sources ta Articles with topics of unclear notability from May All articles with topics of unclear notability Event articles with topics of unclear notability Articles needing additional references from May All articles needing additional references Use dmy dates from May EngvarB from May May Learn how and when to remove this template message.
Therefore the appellant has no cause of action against the respondents.
First owner of copyright – Subject to the provisions of this Act, the author of a work shall be the first owner of the copyright therein:. The learned Senior Counsel for the first respondent during the course of arguments submitted that the publisher is prepared for depositing the income from sale in Court.
Cites 9 docs – [ View All ]. The object of the Copyright Act is to protect the author of the work from the possible fraudulent reproduction of the work without his permission.
This intra court appeal is directed against the order and decretal order dated 9 November in O. The appellant, along with the suit, filed an interlocutory application in O.
The awards were introduced in the yearhonouring the films that were released in It was purely a contract.
ngam : vs Vasan Publications Pvt. Ltd on 2 January,
Oru Kanniyum Moonu Kalavaanikalum. The next question is as to how best the interest of the appellant could be protected pending disposal of the suit. The first respondent has included the black and white copies of the pictures in the book.
It is presented by the Tamil language weekly magazine Ananda Vikatan. Retrieved 19 January For the song “Va Machane” from Irudhi Suttru. Therefore, we are of the view that the appellant has not made out a prima facie case. Irreparable injury, however, does not mean that there must be no physical possibility of repairing the injury, but means only that vvikatan injury must be a material one, namely one that cannot be adequately compensated by way of damages It is for this purpose, the Copyright Act was enacted.
Thiru Thiru Thuru Thuru.
The vi,atan on record gives an indication that Silpi during the period of publication of “Thennattu Selvangal” was on the pay rolls of Ananda Vikatan. Satisfaction that there is a prima facie case by itself is not sufficient to grant injunction.